The Weak Links of Financial Regulatory Reform
Whatever they do, one thing seems very clear. There will still be financial crises in the future. There will still be market bubbles. There will still be serious recessions. And, there will still be Ponzi schemes and fraud committed by financial and non-financial institutions alike. The best we can hope for is that the revised regulations allow for earlier recognition of problems while at the same time avoid stifling the operation of our markets.
Probably the biggest reason reforms will have limited success is their inability to deal with individual human greed and incompetence. A recent article in the Saturday Wall Street Journal titled “Report Says Regulators Missed Shots at Stanford” by Michael Crittenden and Kara Scannell (April17, 2010), stated that “The Securities and Exchange Commission suspected Texas financier R. Allen Stanford of running a Ponzi scheme as early as 1997 but took more than a decade to pursue him seriously, according to a report further tarring the agency that missed Bernard Madoff’s huge fraud.”
The article went on to say that “SEC examiners concluded four times from 1997 to 2004 that Mr. Sanford’s businesses were fraudulent, but each time decided not to go further. Reports about the Madoff Ponzi scheme indicated that the SEC also failed to adequately investigate his operations.
There will always be greedy people. There will always be those who overlook the obvious or have conflicts of interest that motivate them to overlook the obvious.
A number of factors have been said to contribute to the crisis of 2007 and 2008. Low interest rates fueled the housing market. Warnings about problems at Fannie and Freddie were ignored long before the crisis started. Congress itself pushed the mortgage industry to give mortgages to low-income people who really couldn’t afford them. The financial institutions created complex financial instruments that few really understood. Individual Americans ran up their credit card bills and took out second mortgages to buy things they really couldn’t afford. There are many to blame for the crisis – probably others not mentioned here.
So whatever Congress does in the way of regulatory reform, it’s not likely to prevent another crisis down the road. We can only hope that it provides for earlier recognition of problems and helps reduce the magnitude of the resulting damage.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home